In-house Versus “Out-house” Commercial Loan Pricing Models (Part I)

This is the first of a series of Blogs to address the tendency of financial institutions to develop in-house commercial loan pricing models versus adopting proven models available in the marketplace.  Up front I will tell you I am biased in seeking external models in that I have worked with the Hurdle Group, Inc. to make available to financial institutions an internet-based commercial loan pricing system.  The best methodologies available are instituted into the model, not biased by the internal politics as to what methodologies an institution may use.  An example of bias is the cost of funding the loan.  There are numerous proposed methods, understanding there is no perfect method.  Internally, there may be a bias to use current funding or incremental funding costs.  The problem in either of these cases is the miss-match of re-pricing characteristics of the loan versus the funding source.  By using an external model, the decision is made for the institution and is based on sound judgment, not the emotions of internal staff.

 

Phill Rowley

www.hurdlegroup.com

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s